The intent seems fine to me. It fixes an old omission. But I would prefer not to see the text "For charging algorithms other than CC/CV this value can be FFFFh." That's not quite right.
Better would be: "This field is applies only to the CC/CV charging state. When in that state, the value is reflected in the Charge Voltage (or Charge Current) value in CHARGER_STATUS."
I propose an edit in the
I propose an edit in the language.
The intent seems fine to me. It fixes an old omission. But I would prefer not to see the text "For charging algorithms other than CC/CV this value can be FFFFh." That's not quite right.
Better would be: "This field is applies only to the CC/CV charging state. When in that state, the value is reflected in the Charge Voltage (or Charge Current) value in CHARGER_STATUS."
I think that's more precise.
This has been updated based
This has been updated based on your suggestions.